Monthly Archives: January 2010

Celebrating Lilly

January 29, 2010
By Hello Ladies

It’s January 29 so today we are honoring two women named Lilly. The first, Lilly Ledbetter, a brave woman who fought against pay discrimination so that all women would have a better chance at earning a fair salary. Jan. 29 is the anniversary of President Obama signing the Lily Ledbetter Act into law. Thank you Ms. Ledbetter.  We know your work is not finished. So ladies, please take a moment and send a message to your Senators telling them to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act. Despite all of Lilly Ledbetter’s hard work, the wage gap has widened. Women earn, on average just .77 cents for every dollar a man earns. Women of color earn even less.

January 29 also means it’s cold here in New England. There is snow on the ground, the temperature is 18 degrees F, and the wind is gusting to 28 mph. It’s the kind of day that makes us long for summer on Cape Cod. And it’s impossible to think about the Cape without thinking about the unofficial Cape Cod uniform – a Lilly Pulitzer dress.

Lilly Pultizer was a New York Socialite who moved to Palm Beach with her husband in the 1950s. Although she never had to work a day in her life, she was unhappy doing nothing and so she opened a juice bar on the tony Worth Avenue. She designed her own cotton shift dress to wear to work and soon customers started ordering more dresses than juice from her. “The Lilly” was born.

So today, let’s also pay tribute to Lilly Pulitzer, a business woman who lived life according to her own rules, and who dressed to please herself and no one else. Ms. Pulitzer does not need us to sign any petitions, but feel free to check out her 2010 summer collection here.

Hooray for the Lillys!

I forgot Chris Matthews was sexist

January 28, 2010
By Hello Ladies

I forgot Chris Matthews was sexist for an hour last night.

Following the State of the Union address Matthews said of President Obama, “I was trying to think about who he was tonight. It’s interesting; he is post-racial, by all appearances. I forgot he was black tonight for an hour. He’s gone a long way to become a leader of this country and past so much history in just a year or two. I mean it’s something we don’t even think about. I was watching and I said, wait a minute, he’s an African-American guy in front of a bunch of other white people and there he is, president of the United States, and we’ve completely forgotten that tonight — completely forgotten it.”

Here’s a clip.

Wow. So does that means Matthews definition of post-racial is color-blind? A world where black leaders actually seem white – whatever that means? Oh Chris, you really stepped in it this time.

And then, I was watching and I said, wait a minute, he’s a sexist guy in front of a bunch of television viewers and there he is, chauvinist Hardball host, and we’ve completely forgotten that tonight – completely forgotten it.

This is the same Chris Matthews, after all, who linked Hillary Clinton to a she-devil, Nurse Ratched and Madam Defarge, referred to her as witchy, described her laugh as a cackle, and compared her voice to fingernails on a blackboard.

Do I think Matthews meant well last night? Probably. After all, Obama sends thrills up his leg.

But anyone who was surprised by Matthews’ comments last night has a short memory. He’s stepped in it before and he will surely step in it again.

Seriously, Apple. The iPad?

January 27, 2010
By Hello Ladies

I find it funny that Apple named its new tablet, unveiled today, the iPad.  I must be overworked or tired because every time I think about it, I chuckle. Seriously Apple, what were you thinking? A personal product that is ultra thin and you name it the iPad? Computing is not what comes to mind. Feminine protection is.

I’ve worked with Apple marketing execs before and I know how much thought and research go into launching a product. But as they say in the Twitterverse, this was a #fail. Speaking of Twitter, the microblogging site has been buzzing with comments about the name. In fact the term iTampon is trending on the site as I write this. Here’s a sampling of tweets:

@annfriedman “I hope the iPad has wings for extra nighttime protection.”

@JillFilipovic “Can I use the #iPad if I’m in a bathing suit? If I use the #iPad, am I still a virgin?”

@herbadmother “Snort! Wait until they come out with the larger version, or Max iPad. ;) {LOL}”

But this tweet, from @rachelslaj, wasn’t so funny. “The iPad: Proof not enough women work in the Apple Naming Department. //what I said.”

Again, maybe I’m overworked and tired today, but @rachelslaj took the silly right out of my day. I don’t know who was on the iPad product marketing team, but I do know there are too few women in key-decision making roles in corporate America. Consider these statistics. Women represent approximately 85 percent of the consumer buying power in the U.S. But according to a report from Women in the U.S. Retail Trade, women account for just 3.1 percent of CEOs, 19.1 percent of board directors and 18.5 percent of corporate officers in the industry. In the Fortune 500, just 15.2 percent of board seats, and 15.7 percent of corporate officers positions are held by women. Currently, fifteen CEOs in the Fortune 500 are women. And that’s the highest number ever. If the people with the purchasing power are women, then doesn’t it just make sense we need women’s perspectives to help market to them?

Okay, point made. Now back to silly….

 

On Ledbetter Anniversary, Paycheck Fairness Act Gets Attention

January 26, 2010
By Hello Ladies

I think I owe you some good news. Don’t you? Well here it is. I just got off a conference call with Senator Dodd, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, Marcia Greenberger, Co-President of the National Women’s Law Center, and Lilly Ledbetter. Senator Dodd announced he has support from Senator Tom Harkin, Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee to start hearings on the Paycheck Fairness Act.

As you may know, this week is the one year anniversary of President Obama signing the Lilly Ledbetter Act into law. The Ledbetter law gives employees a longer window to file discrimination claims. It is an important piece of legislation, but as Ledbetter said on the call, “The work is far from done.”

The Paycheck Fairness Act will strengthen the Ledbetter Act. One of the most important aspects of the bill is it will prohibit retaliation against employees who ask about or disclose their wages. Said Ledbetter, “This would have been particularly helpful to me. This policy delayed my discovery (that she was being paid less than her male peers) by decades.”

The House passed the Paycheck Fairness legislation in July 2008 but the Senate has not yet acted on it. Hearings are just the start of the process – a bill would hopefully follow and then Dodd would seek floor time in the spring. It is encouraging to hear there is movement on this legislation.

Unfortunately since the passage of the Ledbetter Act, the wage gap has increased not decreased. We need to keep working for equal pay and support the efforts of Dodd and DeLauro. As Rep. DeLauro said this morning, “This is not about women. This is about families.”  If female breadwinners are bringing home less money than they deserve, entire families are shortchanged.

Click here to send a message to your Senators that we need fair pay. I will certainly be sending a message to my new Senator.

Stop the Rape Culture (TRIGGER WARNING)

January 25, 2010
By Hello Ladies

(TRIGGER WARNING) A woman was raped last week in Toledo, Ohio on the side of busy street in broad daylight.  A high school student approached her as she was walking down the street and threatened her with a pair of scissors. Cars drove by and several beeped. One witness called 911 but no one stopped. According to the local police, some witnesses thought the act was consensual and some may not have comprehended what they were seeing. How could they have? This is not supposed to happen in a  civilized society.

Late last year, we were shocked and frightened by the gang rape of a high school girl outside a school dance in Richmond, California. Now we are sickened by a rapist brazen enough to attack out in the open in broad daylight.

(Trigger warning) Over at Shakesville, there is an excellent piece on rape culture – what it is and what contributes to it. I’ve linked to it before. Again, if you can read it, I recommend it.

I thought I was done writing about the Senate election in Massachusetts, but as I reread Melissa McEwan’s piece at Shakesville, I couldn’t help but reflect on our new Senator-elect.

During the last weekend of the campaign, someone at a rally for Scott Brown yelled out a suggestion for Brown’s opponent Attorney General Martha Coakley, “Shove a curling iron up her butt,” yelled the unseen man. You can watch the video here.  Brown asserts he did not hear the comment. But he certainly heard about it after the fact and he never expressed any outrage. That is rape culture.

A rape takes place every two minutes in this country. One in three women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. Who is going to reverse this trend? Certainly not the politician who sees no need to decry public outbursts suggesting sodomy.  Victims should not be held accountable for stopping rape. Rapists, public safety officials and our elected leaders must be held accountable.

And since I plan to stop writing about the election, I want to get this off my chest too. Senator-elect, women are not property.

Blog for Choice

January 22, 2010
By Hello Ladies

Every year on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, NARALPro-Choice America asks bloggers to blog the answer to a question.  This year’s question is in honor of the late Dr. George Tiller who was shot and killed at church one Sunday morning last May. Dr. Tiller often wore a button that read, “Trust Women.” So today, we answer the question: What does “Trust Women” mean to you?

Let me tell you about trusting women. I trust women because a woman gave birth to me, nursed me, cared for me and raised me. She made sure I was well fed, adequately clothed and got enough sleep each night. She got me to school on time and made sure my homework was done. She comforted me when I suffered rejection and then pushed me back out to try again. She made me feel safe when life got scary and she let me go when the time was right. I trust women, because the woman who raised me, trusted me when I moved 3,000 miles away and built my own life.

I trust women because I have worked for women. Women who mortgaged their homes to sustain their business. Women who had the courage to start their own companies in the midst of recession, with no funding, no loans, only their determination and Rolodex. I trust women because I have seen those women not only survive, but thrive. I watched them serve their clients, support their families, reward their employees and earn a profit –all at the same time.

I trust women because I have watched my friends nurse their babies all night, go to work, care for their families after work and begin the cycle all over again. I trust women because I have watched these friends when their babies needed stitches, spinal taps, and brain surgery. I trust these women who exhibited strength, grace and determination under pressure.

I trust women because I watch them serve my community. They hold elected positions, volunteer and fight for that which they believe. I trust women because I watch them challenge the status quo, build consensus, and motivate their constituents. I trust women because I watch them work tirelessly even when they don’t get any credit or public recognition.

And so, I trust women to know what is best for them. I trust women to make their own decisions. And I know that no one but a woman should control her body, because I trust women.

Why the Hate?

January 21, 2010
By Hello Ladies

For the last three months I volunteered my time to the Martha Coakley for Senate campaign. I held signs, made calls, (yes, that was me calling incessantly), canvassed, recruited, tweeted and blogged. Following her loss, I feel much better than I expected I would. Maybe it’s because I know I did all I could to get my candidate elected. Maybe it’s because it feels good to speak up for that which you believe. Maybe it’s because I have seen bigger political disappointments (like the Supreme Court naming George Bush president over Al Gore and then the country electing Bush to a second term). Or maybe it’s because I know, if we were still standing after those eight years, we will still be standing at the end of Senator Brown’s term.

I am not going to engage in post-election quarterbacking. So many others have that covered. But I do want to share what I witnessed on the campaign trail. These experiences were as, if not more, upsetting than the final outcome.

Leading up to the primary, when our group of local volunteers stood out in the cold, holding signs on street corners, most drivers passing by either demonstrated their support with a honk or a thumb’s up, or they ignored us. When we called to ask voters if they would support Martha Coakely, they answered yes, hung up, or responded with a quick, “I’m for Capuano, or Khazei, or Pagliuca.”

After the primary, when we made calls, we started hearing, “I would never vote for her,” or, “No way I’m voting for Coakley.” When we stood out on corners, some drivers would roll down their car windows and yell. “Go Scott Brown,” or “Coakley sucks.”

The #masen Twitter feed, which had been rather sleepy but mostly civil leading up to the primary, was suddenly flooded with #teaparty tweets, some of which contained crude, tasteless comments about Chappaquiddick and Mary Jo Kopechne.

The morning of the election, while holding a sign with two other women outside a polling location (which is also my child’s elementary school,) a man, in a truck,  slowed down, rolled down his window, and yelled to us, “Martha Coakley is a fucking beast.”

At the end of a long day, I was waiting to get results at another polling location. A man, older than me, came in to check the numbers for Scott Brown.  We introduced ourselves and he asked me if I actually liked my candidate, or was I just following party lines. I happen to be an Independent. He was talking to me when I excused myself to read a text from my husband. “Sweetheart,” he said. “You should be at home with him.” Then he proceeded to tell me I was a Socialist and I wouldn’t be happy until I turned the country into Sweden. Sweden, according to this man, is a country of “lard asses” who are lazy and don’t produce anything. Usually I try not to use one data point to describe an entire country. But I asked this man if he had ever been to Sweden. He had not. I have. In fact, I went to tour a manufacturing facility, and was impressed by the innovation I saw there.

Just as I was wondering what Sweden had to do with the Massachusetts special election, he brought the conversation back to Coakley.

“She is stupid,” he said.

“Actually, I think she is quite smart,” I responded.

“Stupid, stupid, stupid.”

“I disagree.”

“She doesn’t even know who Curt Schilling is.”
“I don’t care if my Senator can name the 2002 starting lineup for the Red Sox,” I said.

“She is STUPID.”

At that point the polling warden came over to share the results with us. I took out my notebook and pen and wrote them down. My Brown counterpart looked around for something to write on and then said, “You are going to write them down for me too, aren’t you?”

“No.”

“You’re not?” He seemed surprised.

“No.”

You really won’t help me?” He seemed shocked.

“No. I came prepared with a  paper and pen. You did not. Who’s stupid now?”

It was that exchange, and the man swearing at me from his truck, that had me more depressed than the final results. So much rudeness. So much hate. And that, is what prevailed in this election.

Massachusetts Special Election Today

January 19, 2010
By Hello Ladies

Today is the Massachusetts Special Election. If you live in Massachusetts, don’t forget to vote.

We are volunteering today. So until we return, here is an interesting  op-ed on the election from Joan Vennochi at boston.com.

Mass Senate Race: The Personality Parade

January 18, 2010
By Hello Ladies

Much of the media coverage of the Massachusetts special election to fill Ted Kennedy’s senate seat has focused on the leading candidates’ personalities, or perceived lack of personality in the case of Attorney General Martha Coakley. Reporters are quick to point out voters know more about Coakley professionally than personally. She has been referred to as an ice queen and a mean girl, monotone, robotic, with no fire in her belly, and the “personality of a frumpy substitute teacher.”

 The Boston Globe says,

“She hides her personality behind a businesslike veneer.”

Inherent in many of these articles I believe there is an unconscious gender bias. Many career women, especially women from Coakley’s generation, have been conditioned to separate their personal and professional personas. We are taught that in order to be taken seriously, we must be serious. We are told that to get to the top, we must emulate those at the top. And the reality is, most of the people at the top are still men.  As a result women are trained that sports talk is okay. Girl talk is not.

When I was pregnant, I tried to change the topic and redirect any conversations about my pregnancy while at work.  This despite the fact my protruding belly took up half the conference room. When I returned from maternity leave, I did not bring any pictures of my children to work and never discussed motherhood for fear I would be seen as a flight risk by my bosses.

But so much political coverage these days focuses on a candidate’s personality and so-called likeability. Is the candidate warm? Do we know them personally? And the all-important question, would we want to have a beer with them?

The above-quoted Globe article goes on to reveal some personal details about Coakley.

“Behind the scenes, Coakley reveals a quick wit and an almost easygoing personality that is striking in its contrast to her campaign identity. She expounds on her preference for pale ales (and Sam Adams or Harpoon over Guinness). She quotes lyrics from Broadway musicals (favorite: “Man of La Mancha’’). She describes hearing former governor Mitt Romney sing show tunes (yes, he can sing). She explains her unusual accent (it reflects her youth in North Adams, her career as a lawyer, and her parents’ Rhode Island origins).”

The reality is, most voters will never sit down for a beer or belt out show tunes with our elected officials. And really, why would we want to? What matters in an election is the candidates’ track records, voting history and stance on the key issues of the day. Results are what matter. At least, that’s what they taught all of us working women at the office. So to judge a woman candidate’s lack of so-called personality is to dismiss the realities of professional women. Furthermore, we are still a long way, baby, from a woman centerfold being taken seriously as a senate candidate.

Perhaps, the most ridiculous coverage I saw of Coakley, was an interview with Andy Hiller of local news station WHDH. His bio claims he is “regarded as the most provocative political reporter in New England.”

Here is some of the exchange between Hiller and Coakley:

Hiller: “With respect to your sense of humor- what’s your favorite joke?”

Coakley “Oh, I’m a horrible joke teller. I’ll be the first to tell that…” I have a horrible memory for jokes. I know them when I hear them. But I can’t give you one now.”

Hiller: “How can you replace Sen. Ted Kennedy if you can’t tell a joke? He was the best at it.”

Provocative? Hardly.

Adrian Walker at Boston.com wrote of Coakley,

“She is solid, sane, and responsible, and in a short race, that will have to see her through.”

Fine with me.

Haiti: How to Help

January 13, 2010
By Hello Ladies

Cick here to go to the American Red Cross web site where you can donate and get information on the situation in Haiti.

Click here to read an article from The Nation with information on different organizations working on the ground in Haiti and what they need for support.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes