Veteran’s Day Round Up

November 11, 2009

soldierToday, thank a veteran and brush up on your facts about women in the military. According to Service Women’s Action Network (SWAN), a non-profit organization that works to improve the welfare of U.S. servicewomen and veterans, women currently represent 15 percent of the armed forces. Almost 200,000 women have deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan. Learn more here.

Here are some interesting reads from around the web:

* Feministing on sexual assault in the military

* A thought-provoking take on the Fort Hood tragedy from Care2

* A statistic laden article about women in the military from The Reporter

* And finally, a feel good story about a soldier and his dog.

Why We Need Women in Office

November 10, 2009

politician

Last night, in the town where I live, we had a warrant review in preparation for a special town meeting. On the table are some critical items to do with education, raising taxes and smut zoning. As I looked around the room, I observed how few women are in power:

-9 person finance committee: 2 are women

-5 person board of selectman: 1 is a woman

- 7 person school committee: 2 are women

- 5 person planning board: no women

And yet the town population over the age of 18 is 54 percent female and 46 percent male. That is not representative government.

We’ve written before about the need for women to lead. Diverse leadership leads to better problem solving, more creativity, representative government. Girls need role models so they know they too can grow up to serve and lead some day.

And then this weekend, we witnessed the House trade women’s rights for healthcare reform. The Women’s Campaign Forum writes that if there were more women representatives, the Stupak amendment would have been defeated.

she shoudlrunThere are some great organizations that support women who want to run for elected office. I encourage you to take a look. Start with She Should Run.

(Logo used with Creative Commons license.)

Wild Weekend

November 9, 2009

bishopIt was a wild ride for healthcare reform and for women this weekend. Saturday started with women Democrats in the House trying to speak about gender discrimination by insurance providers. However, they were repeatedly interrupted by their male counterparts across the aisle. Watch the video here.

 

 The day ended with the House passing healthcare legislation, but somewhere in the middle women were used as pawns.

Before voting on the healthcare package, the House approved the Stupak-Pitts amendment, which severely restricts access to abortion. Women can, however, purchase a costly abortion rider in case they are planning an unplanned pregnancy.

Representative Stupak and others had threatened to vote down the final healthcare bill unless the amendment passed. And ultimately 64 Democrats and 176 Republicans voted in favor of it. Many of those same lawmakers then voted against the healthcare bill later that night.

Regardless of personal or religious beliefs, how can women not find it disturbing that our lawmakers were so comfortable trading our rights in exchange for their end goal? The media has framed the move as “pragmatic” and a “concession,” but those words are merely euphemisms. It speaks volumes that our politicians knew just how easy it would be to trade women in exchange for political gain.

Starting with the blatant disrespect shown on the floor Saturday morning, to the passage of the amendment later in the day, this weekend felt like anything but progress.

A Corporate Fantasy

November 6, 2009

home officeYesterday I attended The Boston Club’s Corporate Salute honoring New England companies with two or more women directors on their boards. The Boston Club is a great organization, run by high caliber people who help businesses find women directors.  The event was well run and well attended. But I walked away disappointed.

Three women, two from the Boston Club and one a keynote (Sharon Allen, Chair of the Board of Directors for Deloitte LLP) spoke about the lack of women, the need for women, and the benefits of having women at the top of businesses. Allen shared stories from her personal career and was a great speaker.

But while I sat there and ate my egg frittata next to highly competent women with their oversized patent leather bags, Prada eyewear and high-heeled pumps (4 is the new 3″ fyi), I daydreamed about the speeches I wanted to hear.

You see, The Boston Club just released its annual census which looks at the number of women on boards and in the executive suites of the top 100 public companies in Massachusetts. And according to the data, not only has the Commonwealth not made any progress in this area, it is moving backwards. You can download the report here.

Women represent just 11.3 percent of all directors in Massachusetts and only 8.6 percent of all executive officers. More than half of the companies surveyed have no women C-level executives at all. The percentage of women directors is basically flat since last year but the number of women executives is the lowest it has been since The Boston Club first compiled a census in 2003. The percentage of women among the highest paid executives is 23, a full point lower than last year. For women of color, the situation is even bleaker. They represent only  two C-level executives and 10 directors at the top 100 public companies.

And so, in light of this data, I wanted the speakers to stand up and yell, “Bullshit!” I didn’t want to hear their restrain and reason – their calm discussion about how women at the top make a positive impact on the bottom-line — or how businesses benefit from diverse management teams –that businesses need a woman’s perspective to relate to their customers (remember women control at least 85 percent of all consumer purchasing power, represent 51 percent of the population, and represent the majority of today’s workforce.) I’ve heard it all before.

I wanted them to call, “Foul!” There is no legitimate reason for this lack of diversity. Women are graduating college, law school and business school at greater rates than ever, and organization’s like The Boston Club can help identify the top candidates. The women are there.

The event organizers had representatives from companies with two or more women directors stand up for recognition. In my daydream, representatives from the companies with No women at the top stood up and all of us threw tomatoes at them (they were served with the frittatas).

Is it any wonder I no longer wear high heels and carry expensive totes to work, and instead wear pajamas and Uggs to my “office” everyday?

Don’t Kill Grandma

November 5, 2009

granny

There are two sides to every issue. Yesterday the National Women’s Law Center sponsored a day of blogging about healthcare reform.You can read the posts here. Today, the Tea Party Patriots are holding a nationwide rally at the Capitol Steps in Washington, D.C. to “kill the bill.” For those who can’t attend, there is an online “war room” with information on contacting Congress. There is also a website called Don’t Kill Grandma detailing the rally and the group’s take on the issues.

I completely agree we should not kill Grandma. However, since we are going to let her live, shouldn’t we at least offer her – and her daughters and granddaughters – equal coverage for equal premiums, access to quality maternity care and insurance policies at least comparable to Grandpa’s?

 It’s only fair.

You are Not a Pre-Existing Condition

November 4, 2009

DeniedDo you know who may be denied health insurance?

* Me. I had a Cesarean section. C-sections are pre-existing conditions.

* A good friend of mine. Her husband hit her. Domestic violence is a pre-existing condition.

*The one in six women who will be sexually assaulted. Rape is a pre-existing condition.

*Another good friend of mine. She underwent IVF. Fertility treatments are a pre-existing condition.

Ladies, we are NOT pre-existing conditions.

The list goes on:

*My cousin. She is having a baby. Many health insurance policies do not cover maternity care.

*My sister. She needs a mammogram. It’s not covered by her insurer.

*My neighbor. Her health insurance company charges her more than they charge men but her employer pays her less. She can’t afford coverage.

*You. If you are a non-smoker. Health insurance companies typically charge female NON-smokers more than male smokers.

Most gender-based discrimination occurs in the private insurance market, where the self-employed and small businesses find insurance. But even among the group health insurance market, gender discrimination exists.  Insurance companies are allowed to determine premiums based on the number of women a firm employs.

This is appalling. Health reform is NOT a political issue. It is a matter of human rights. Click HERE to contact Congress TODAY and tell them a woman is NOT a pre-existing condition. We deserve equal coverage for equal premiums.

(*NOTE: Clickon the title of this post to view a video.)

Read more on this topic here and thank you to the National Women’s Law Centerfor their report “Nowhere to Turn: Insurance Companies Treat Women Like a Pre-Existing Condition”  which you can download here.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes