Posts Tagged ‘ Chanel ’

What the Safe Cosmetics Act Means for Women of a Certain Age

July 27, 2010
By

Last week a new video, “The Story of Cosmetics,” was released in an effort to raise awareness about the chemicals cosmetics companies use in products. The video was co-produced by The Story of Stuff Project, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and Free Range Studios. The video is timed to correspond with the introduction of the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010, H.R. 5786 introduced by Reps. Ed Markey (D-MA), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL). The proposed legislation would require cosmetic companies to disclose information about the ingredients and chemicals they use in personal care products. According to a press release from the three U.S. Representatives, under current law the FDA cannot require cosmetic companies to conduct safety assessments or follow FDA labeling guidelines on their products. As such, the average consumer has no idea what the risks, if any, are of slathering their skin with lotion containing Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer.

As a feminist, I am very bothered by the fact the cosmetics industry has been allowed to operate unchecked for so many years. I have to wonder if men were the primary users of personal care products would Washington have allowed the industry to go unchecked for so long? After all, advocacy groups claim many household items contain carcinogens and chemicals known to harm animals.

But as a woman-of-a-certain-age, I have to admit, my agenda is slightly different. To be honest, I am more interested in knowing if my L’Oreal Root Rescue™ will really cover 100 percent of my gray coverage than if it contains paraphenylenediamine. And much more important to me at this stage of the game is knowing if my Chanel Rouge Coco Hydrating Crème Lip Colour will bleed into those tiny lines around my mouth than knowing if it contains lead. And the really pressing issue for me is can a woman over 40 pull off OPI Catch Me in Your Net without looking like a fool – not what is Titanium Dioxide?

So while I am in favor of most of what the Safe Cosmetics Act calls for: cosmetic and ingredient testing, ingredient labels on cosmetics, post-market testing, cosmetics and ingredient statements, and mandatory reporting of adverse health effects, I admit, I am a little nervous about giving the FDA recall authority for products that fail to meet a safety standard. I guess I’d first want to know what percentage of the FDA is run by women and if the women are as hooked on Shu Uemura Velvet Perfect Adjusting Powdery Foundation as I am.

Fall Fashion Trend: Naked with a Burberry Umbrella and a Diet Coke

October 21, 2009
By

“Our ability to accessorize is what separates us from the animals.” – Steel Magnolias

runwaymodelI am an accessories girl. So this season I have my eye on the Verdura cuff The House of Chanel is releasing in honor of the famous jeweler’s 70th anniversary. Chanel will issue a limited edition collection of 70 cuffs, 35 of which are signed and numbered. The price tag is around $29,500 –each. I love the Fulco cuff. Love it. But I refuse to buy one. Because this season I am banning Chanel. (Unlike every other season when I just can’t afford Chanel.) Verdura ivory enamel cuffs (small)

Why? Because last week, German fashion magazine, Brigitte, said it was no longer going to use professional models in its editorial. Instead, the magazine is looking for “real women” with whom who readers can better identify. Apparently the editors are also tired of photo shopping the models to camouflage their protruding collarbones.

 
Well, in response to the Bridgette team’s news, Karl Lagerfeld, head designer for Chanel, told another German magazine, Focus, that “No one wants to see curvy women,” and, “You’ve got fat mothers with their bags of chips sitting in front of the television and saying that thin models are ugly.”

So while some in the fashion industry are working to promote healthier body images, others, like Lagerfeld, are not. And speaking of Photoshop….

When it comes to accessories, shoes are my absolute favorite. This season I have my eye on the Carminda boot from Ralph Lauren. These boots are fabulous: brown burnished leather, pointy toes and 4 inch heels. But alas, I will not buy them. No, not because they cost $1200. Nor is it because there is no way this fat, chip-eating, TV-watching mother can get them over her calves. It is because this season I am banning Ralph Lauren.
Ralph Lauren, you see, doesn’t use Photoshop to plump up its models. No, they use Photoshop to distort their models. Apparently size zero women are just too fat for their campaigns. They prefer size physically impossible. RL Photoshop

The company did apologize after this photo shopped image (Eds. note: Images will not appear on Hello Ladies homepage. Click story headline to see the picture.) caused an outcry on the Internet. But now there is news of another retouched image causing a stir.

I am tired of these men dictating what is fashionable to women. So, next time you see me, I will be naked, holding a Burberry umbrella and drinking a Diet Coke.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes