Posts Tagged ‘ harmony wu ’

Woman in Politics: Harmony Wu

May 25, 2010
By

Harmony Wu

Since we’re always urging women to get involved politically, we thought it would be informative to share insights from a woman who is. Last week I sat down with Harmony Wu, a political activist in Needham, Massachusetts to find out what motivates her to do what she does.

I first heard of Wu when I worked on the Martha Coakley for U.S. Senate campaign. Volunteers at the phone bank I managed would come in every night and say, “You need to meet Harmony. You should really meet Harmony.”

Fast forward to the healthcare vote and our induction of Congressman Stephen Lynch into the Ignorant Male Legislator’s club. We posted a job opening for someone to take his place in the Ninth Congressional  district; someone who would represent the district and lead with courage and integrity. Later that same day, we heard Harmony Wu was considering a run for the seat.

After some serious consideration, Wu decided not to run, posting this statement on her website:

Over the last two weeks, I have met with numerous people to address the many aspects of a potential campaign against Mr. Lynch. The ability to maintain my family life during the campaign and as a member of Congress has always been an important factor for me, as it has been for so many women seeking and serving in office. In my case, it prevents me from launching what would be a vigorous campaign and if elected, committing to a life that would require far too much time away from family at this moment in our lives. In the end, this is the decisive factor for me.

I admit I was slightly disappointed that Wu cited family life not just as a factor in her decision, but as a factor for other women considering political life. I understand family first. I do. And in her shoes I may have reached the same decision. I just don’t want to see all women painted with the same broad brush stroke. I don’t buy into the idea that maintaining and preserving the family unit is a woman’s job. I believe it is a parent’s job and should be based on the individual, not the gender. Just like running for office should be an individual decision, not a gender decision.

Fast forward again. I finally met Harmony Wu and she opened up about her decision-making process.  And what she had to say about the prospects for women in politics is a fair and unsurprising commentary from someone who took a close look.

Wu wasn’t always politically active. But observing the Bush administration inspired her to get involved in the last presidential election. “I swore I would do everything in my power to do more,” she says and after the primary she volunteered for the Obama campaign with Organizing for America.

After the presidential election, Wu worked on a local Selectman’s campaign but wasn’t active on a  day-to-day-basis. “Then Ted Kenendy passed away,” she says. And things in Massachusetts changed. Wu went from the Senate race to the race to fill Scott Brown’s State Senator seat. Both candidate’s she supported  lost, but she wasn’t deterred.

In fact her energy and organizing skills attracted attention and Wu was drafted to run against Lynch. “I spent a lot of time exploring, talking to people. There was a lot of support and people telling me, ‘We’ll do what we can.’ But there were also people saying I wasn’t an insider, I had no experience and asking me if I could raise money.”

Wu says her ability to raise money was always the first question asked of her, although for her, the number one question was could she do the job. In the end, she determined that job, one that requires constant fundraising, was not for her.

I asked Wu if, based on what she saw up close, a woman could get elected in Massachusetts? “You know there’s a woman thing, but also a regular person thing,” she says. “Unless you’re on a path to be Guy Smiley from the day you’re born, it’s tough to break in. There’s a gate, a barrier. The lifestyle is different. It’s not family friendly.

“It’s the professionalizing of politics. You have to be in it — in training. It’s been made so unattractive. Massachusetts politics… it’s a tough club.”

Still, Wu believes there’s a “huge pent up desire” to see a woman elected, at least in the more progressive communities.  And she is by no means backing down. She isn’t running for Congress but she is supporting Mac D’Alessandro in his primary bid against Lynch, tearing up the Twitter on the #mapoli hashtag and organizing her neighbors at Yes We Can Needham.  Wu won’t hold an elected office any time soon, but she will hold those in office accountable. And if you’re a progressive woman looking to run, Wu’s probably got your back.

REMINDER: We are giving away a print from Carolyn Draws. Leave a comment and we’ll enter you in our contest.

Missing: Women in Politics

May 21, 2010
By

Check out the latest data from the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) on the number of women in government worldwide. Just 18.9 percent of all elected leaders in both upper and lower parliamentary branches combined (House and Senate for example) are women. That’s correct, less than twenty percent of the world leaders (where data is available) are women.

The IPU’s mission is to establish representative democracy across the globe. One of its main areas of focus is women in politics.  In 1997, the IPU Council adopted a Universal Declaration on Democracy which states, “The achievement of democracy presupposes a genuine partnership between men and women in the conduct of the affairs of society in which they work in equality and complementarity, drawing mutual enrichment from their differences.”

The IPU has also stated, “The concept of democracy will only assume true and dynamic significance when political policies and national legislation are decided upon jointly by men and women with equitable regard for the interests and aptitudes of both halves of the population.”

Yet here we are in 2010 with a worse than 80/20 split of men and women in leadership.  And the United States is no role model.  Our percentages in the House and Senate are below the worldwide average and we rank 74 on a list of countries classified by descending order of the percentage of women in the lower or single House. We rank behind Rwanda (number 1), Sweden (number 2), Norway, Cuba, Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and others.  In 2009, we ranked 72. That is not progress.

What can we do about it?

The IPU published a Plan of Action “To Correct Present Imbalances in the Participation of Men and Women in Political Life”.  When I read the plan, I was reminded of a conversation I had last year with one of my Selectman in the town where I live. He was up for reelection at the time. He told me the reason our town established a Sustainability Initiative was because an environmental activist had run against this Selectman in a previous election in order to raise awareness about environmental issues.

“So maybe I should run against you in this round to raise awareness for the gender imbalance in town politics.”

“What are you talking about?” he said “We have a woman on the board.” He wasn’t being flip. He was serious. There is one woman on a five person board so in his mind there is no problem even though that hardly gets us to critical mass (at least 33 percent representation) and the rest of the town boards are woefully unbalanced in favor of men.

Former Speaker of the House and classic Boston politician Tip O’Neill once said,”All politics is local.” In that phrase lies the answer to what can we do.

Start local. Most of us won’t ever get an invitation to the UN to discuss this issue, but we all have access to our local town hall. Pay attention to your town or city’s politics and ask the tough questions. Support women candidates with time and or money. Ask a woman to run for office, or better yet, why don’t you run? She Should Run is a great resource for women considering a run.  That’s how the political machine works: start at the bottom and make your way up.  

And visit us again Monday. I recently met with Harmony Wu, a small force of nature on the Massachusetts Democratic scene, and I will share my interview with her here.

Another Wild Weekend

March 22, 2010
By

We spent all day yesterday glued to our Blackberry and to C-SPAN. The House finally voted in favor of healthcare reform sometime around 11 p.m. Sunday – but not before some very ugly moments elapsed and some serious negotiation –using women’s health as the bargaining chip – took place.

On Saturday, protestors in Washington yelled hateful racial and homophobic slurs at several Congressmen, and in cyberspace plenty of hateful posts could be viewed in Twitter streams. Then late Sunday night, someone on the House floor yelled “baby killer” at Rep. Bart Stupak.

Stupak had been threatening to derail healthcare reform unless the final bill included his amendment containing some very restrictive abortion language. But the bill before the House contained the Nelson amendment, which also restricted access to abortion coverage. Even though pro-choice advocates said the Nelson amendment was a major blow to women’s reproductive rights, Stupak wouldn’t yield. After whisperings about closed door negotiations between Stupak and Pelosi, and Pelosi and pro-choice Democrats, a deal was struck. President Obama agreed to sign an Executive Order effectively supporting the Hyde amendment, which is already in place and prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions, and Stupak agreed to support the bill.

Meanwhile, closer to home, it looked as if we might be getting our first application for the job we just posted. Late Friday a group of supporters posted on Blue Mass Group and Facebook that Harmony Wu, a Needham, Mass. resident and Democratic activist, was considering a run for the 9th Congressional District if Rep. Steven Lynch voted against the healthcare bill. He was indeed a “no” vote.

Here is a statement from Ms. Wu issued this morning. “Late last night, members of Congress cast an historic vote to pass comprehensive health care reform. I know I share my excitement of its passage with millions of Americans across the country. My gratitude goes to all who worked tirelessly to earn this important victory; when we work together, and each do our part, we can make great things happen. As excited as I am about this historic step toward health care for all, I am extremely disappointed that my Congressperson voted against the health care reform bill, demonstrating that he is out of touch with our families’ most important concerns. With this betrayal of key Democratic principles and priorities, we in the 9th district must strongly question whether Mr. Lynch can effectively represent us and stand up for our values. In the coming days, I will be in discussion with my family, members of my community, activists, and voters from across the district as I consider challenging Mr. Lynch for the Democratic nomination for Congress from our 9th district.”

We don’t know enough about Harmony Wu yet to determine if she meets all of the qualifications outlined in our job description. But she is definitely one to watch.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes