<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hello Ladies &#187; Sarah Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helloladies.com/tag/sarah-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helloladies.com</link>
	<description>The intersection of feminism and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<div id='fb-root'></div>
					<script type='text/javascript'>
						window.fbAsyncInit = function()
						{
							FB.init({appId: null, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});
						};
						(function()
						{
							var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;
							e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';
							document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);
						}());
					</script>	
						<item>
		<title>Women Newsmakers in 2011</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2011/12/nine-top-stories-involving-women-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2011/12/nine-top-stories-involving-women-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 year in review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breastfeeding in public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren enters Mass Senate race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender wage gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldine Ferraro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mikulski longest serving woman senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target nurse-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories Involving Women in 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top women news in 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart v. dukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's reproductive rights under attack in 2011. Speaker John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=6189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another year almost over, another few cents narrowing the wage gap. Here’s a look back at some of the stories that impacted or involved women in 2011: Reproductive rights under attack: Three days into the year we wrote, &#8220;Congressman John Boehner (R-Ohio) will become Speaker of the House Wednesday and women should pay attention. &#8230; In fact, he represents a significant threat to women’s reproductive rights.&#8221; And indeed 2011 saw some of the most aggressive attacks on women&#8217;s reproductive health. Ashley Portero at the International Business Times has a round up of the staggering number measures related to reproductive health introduced in 2011 including: H.R. 3 with its disturbing &#8220;forcible rape&#8221;  language (as if all rape isn&#8217;t forcible?) H.R. 358, the Protect Life Act, or as some are called it, the Let Women Die Act. The Heartbeat Bill, which would ban abortions after the first detectable fetal heartbeat- before many women even know they are pregnant. Two fetuses were witnesses at an Ohio legislative committee contemplating this bill. And of course, the attack on Planned Parenthood. Rape and intimate partner violence a very real threat: Speaking of women&#8217;s health, in November the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released The National [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2011/12/nine-top-stories-involving-women-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hello Ladies Guide to Sexism in Politics</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2011/08/the-hello-ladies-guide-to-sexism-in-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2011/08/the-hello-ladies-guide-to-sexism-in-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloria feldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is Newsweek cover sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political attack ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism in the media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist political ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hello Ladies guide to sexism in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=5192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest presidential election cycle has only just begun and already we are engaged in some lively discussions about the sexist treatment of candidate Michele Bachmann. Was the Newsweek cover photo of the Congresswoman and the accompanying headline sexist? Was the &#8220;submissive wife&#8221; question out of line?  Sexism may seem more out in front during a presidential campaign but it exists in politics all the time &#8211; and at the state and local level too. Some of the sexism is over the top, and some not so obvious. To help you easily identify and respond to unfair treatment of female politicians, here is &#8220;The Hello Ladies Guide to Sexism in Politics.&#8221; Overt sexism: In this category we have the outrageous remarks that make you scream, &#8220;How does this person (insert name of person who spoke or wrote the sexist comment) keep their job?!&#8221; Examples: Conan O&#8217;Brien sidekick Andy Richter&#8217;s recent tweet that read, &#8220;There&#8217;s nothing wrong with Michele Bachmann that two solid weeks of orgasms won&#8217;t cure.&#8221; Statements like that one attempt to reduce a female candidate to a shrew, a sexual object, anything but a viable contender for the job. An Alex Beam column in The Boston Globe during the Massachusetts Senate race last [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2011/08/the-hello-ladies-guide-to-sexism-in-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Can&#8217;t Agree: Is the Bachmann Newsweek Cover Sexist?</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2011/08/why-we-cant-agree-if-the-bachmann-newsweek-cover-is-sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2011/08/why-we-cant-agree-if-the-bachmann-newsweek-cover-is-sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is Newsweek cover sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media portrayal of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsweek bachmann sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen of Rage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terry O&#8217;Neill from the National Organization for Women (NOW) says yes, it is. Salon&#8217;s Joan Walsh says no, it&#8217;s not. And feminist icon Gloria Steinem says it&#8217;s borderline. Pundits are split on whether or not Newsweek&#8217;s decision to run the unflattering (we can all agree on that, right?) picture of presidential candidate Michele Bachmann was sexist. Why is it so hard to figure out? I think  it stems from the way the media has conditioned us to think about and view women. When so many young, female characters on television are sexualized, when even the most beautiful women in the world are airbrushed, when we see too few images of strong, athletic women and when so much of our news comes from the male point of view, we struggle with what is reality, what is media manipulation, how we view other women and what we&#8217;ve come to expect of how the media views us. And then add politics to the mix and things get even more distorted. With such small numbers of women participating in politics, the media turns the few women who do into Everywoman. Remember, for example, how a vote for Hillary Clinton was portrayed as a vagina vote, not a vote [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2011/08/why-we-cant-agree-if-the-bachmann-newsweek-cover-is-sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignorant Legislator of the Week</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2011/06/ignorant-legislator-of-the-week-2/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2011/06/ignorant-legislator-of-the-week-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John LaBruzzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=4432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our ignorant legislator of the week award is back and this week&#8217;s recipient is &#8230; Nope, not Sarah Palin. Even though she keeps rambling about Paul Revere and bells and warning the British and the Second Amendment and blah, blah, blah. She is no longer governor. And no, not Anthony Weiner &#8211; he just needs to stop talking and tweeting. The winner is Rep. John LaBruzzo, a Republican from the Louisiana House of Representatives. You may remember LaBruzzo because he caused quite a stir back in 2008 when he proposed a program that would pay welfare recipients for getting sterilized. Well he&#8217;s back. Now LaBruzzo is shepherding a bill that would Revises the Human Life Protection Act and make performing an abortion illegal in Louisiana. And LaBruzzo doesn&#8217;t care if the pregnancy is the result of incest or rape. And his arguments don&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense. Yesterday he argued, &#8220;Now the opponents in the opposition argue that whether we make it illegal or not, people are going to get abortions. Well, we’ve illegalized murder and drugs for a long long time, and yet those crimes continue to take place.&#8221; Here he is in action. LaBruzzo was joined by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2011/06/ignorant-legislator-of-the-week-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank You Geraldine Ferraro</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2011/03/thank-you-geraldine-ferraro/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2011/03/thank-you-geraldine-ferraro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldine Ferraro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=3841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geraldine Ferraro died yesterday at the age of 75 from complications related to blood cancer. It’s Women’s History Month and Ferraro was definitely a woman who made history. In 1984 she inspired generations when she was chosen by Walter Mondale as the first female vice presidential candidate of the United States. In her concession speech, Ferraro said, “My candidacy has said the days of discrimination are numbered.” Ferraro’s run was marred by sexism, including a comment from Barbara Bush who said of her husband’s opponent, “I can&#8217;t say it but it rhymes with &#8216;rich.” However, many credit her candidacy with changing the political landscape. More women were elected to Congress and appointed cabinet positions post-1984. Ferraro had been a Congresswoman prior to the 1984 election, representing Queens, New York. Following the election, Ferraro remained a strong advocate for women and was not afraid to speak out against sexism. She was a fierce supporter of Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign, getting herself in hot water for some comments she made about Barack Obama. We owe a lot to Geraldine Ferraro. Thank you.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2011/03/thank-you-geraldine-ferraro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shooting in Arizona; Stop the Hate</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2011/01/child-and-judge-killed-congresswoman-shot-in-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2011/01/child-and-judge-killed-congresswoman-shot-in-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Loughner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherriff Dupnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=3142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today a lone gunman opened fire in front of a supermarket in Arizona. He killed a nine year old child, a federal judge, and two others. He shot U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords in the head and wounded several other people. Police have 22 year old Jared Loughner in custody for the crime. The Internet is exploding with theories and commentary about the shooting. The shooter had a MySpace page which has been taken down and also has a series of strange videos on YouTube which discuss U.S. currency and other ramblings. Was the shooting politically motivated? Was Loughner just a deranged young man? We don&#8217;t have the facts yet. But there are two things we know for sure. First, guns kill. Shooters pull the trigger, no doubt. But they couldn&#8217;t deliver the bullets without the guns. Second, the political rhetoric and culture of hate in this country is out of control. We live in a time when former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin published a list of political targets marked with gun crossfires. Palin also delivered the infamous tweet, &#8220;Don&#8217;t retreat. Instead&#8211;reload.&#8221; Tea Party members rally with signs that say, &#8220;We come unarmed&#8230; this time&#8221; and &#8220;I own a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2011/01/child-and-judge-killed-congresswoman-shot-in-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Political Review (Slideshow)</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2010/12/2010-politics-in-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2010/12/2010-politics-in-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternity leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paycheck fairness act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tebow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=2951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a look back at just a few of the political stories we were talking about in 2010. What do you think 2011 will bring?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2010/12/2010-politics-in-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Things We Need to Do to Send a Woman to the White House</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2010/07/six-things-we-need-to-do-to-send-a-woman-to-the-white-house/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2010/07/six-things-we-need-to-do-to-send-a-woman-to-the-white-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connie saltonstall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloria feldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Brunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[She Should Run]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skinnyscoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=1901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I posted a question at SkinnyScoop: Do you think a woman will be elected president in your lifetime? Most of the respondents (81 percent) said yes. No one answered definitely not. I sure hope the respondents are right, but getting there won&#8217;t be easy. One respondent at SkinnyScoop wrote, &#8220;We are ready and there are more of us than them, we just need to get out and vote ladies.&#8221; It seems simple. But it&#8217;s not. The sad truth is we haven&#8217;t moved past the misogyny and sexism we witnessed during Hillary Clinton&#8217;s candidacy. Senate hopeful Martha Coakley didn’t do herself any favors when she made some bad campaign decisions last winter but the press didn&#8217;t do her many favors either. And the Republicans don&#8217;t seem to treat their women much better, as Newsweek recently pointed out. I remember during Clinton&#8217;s presidential run people groaning about the word misogyny. &#8220;I&#8217;m so sick of feminists talking about misogyny,&#8221; friends and coworkers would tell me when I was discussing things Tucker Carlson, Chris Matthews, Glen Beck and Keith Olbermann had said on television the night before. I challenge those same people to come up with a better explanation for Playboy&#8217;s recent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2010/07/six-things-we-need-to-do-to-send-a-woman-to-the-white-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Varying Degrees of Progress</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2010/06/varying-degrees-of-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2010/06/varying-degrees-of-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminist Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johanna Sigurdardottir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=1841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iceland&#8217;s prime minister, Johanna Sigurdardottir, just got married – to another woman; the country&#8217;s marriage equality laws went into effect this past week. And for the record, Iceland elected its first female president, Vigdís Finnbogadóttir, thirty years ago. Now that&#8217;s progress. Meanwhile, Australia has a new prime minister – its first woman to hold the position, (progress) and she is unmarried, which is causing significant discussion. Julia Gillard, elected June 24, does have a boyfriend and the Sydney Morning Herald is concerned with their living arrangements. In article titled, &#8220;Shacking up is hard to do: why Gillard may be leery of the Lodge,&#8221; writer Bettina Arndt worries that, &#8220;as a popular role model for women, her lifestyle choice may influence other women into making big mistakes about their lives.&#8221; That mistake is &#8220;wasting precious breeding time in such uncertain relationships.&#8221; Wow. That doesn&#8217;t feel like progress. The newspaper even ran a poll asking &#8220;Do you agree that Julia Gillard&#8217;s de facto lifestyle is a bad influence for women?&#8221; So far 78 percent of respondents have said no. That&#8217;s progress. And here in the United States, the closest we&#8217;ve come to electing a woman to lead the country was Hillary Clinton&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2010/06/varying-degrees-of-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsweek takes on sexism</title>
		<link>http://helloladies.com/2010/03/newsweek-takes-on-sexism/</link>
		<comments>http://helloladies.com/2010/03/newsweek-takes-on-sexism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hello Ladies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paycheck fairness act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helloladies.com/?p=1237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brava to the three Newsweek writers who take on gender discrimination at their own magazine. In the March 29 issue Jessica Bennett, Jesse Ellison and Sarah Ball ask just how far women at Newsweek have come since 46 women filed a sexual discrimination suit against the magazine in 1970. They go on to describe a culture of sexism perhaps less blatant than the corporate landscape of the 1960s and 70s but harder to confront. It is the micro inequities women face every day that can be hardest to address. Tell me &#8220;women don&#8217;t write here&#8221; &#8220;or sell here&#8221; or &#8220;manage here&#8221; and I can deal with that. But fail to give me the choice assignments and instead hand them to my male colleagues and what do I do with that? And good luck getting any support from coworkers – male or female. No one wants to fight the good fight, especially since we&#8217;ve been told we already won. Write the authors, &#8220;There&#8217;s no denying that we&#8217;re enjoying many of the spoils of those women&#8217;s victories. We are no longer huddled in secret; we&#8217;re reporting for a national magazine, and we&#8217;re the ones doing the writing. We have a president whose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://helloladies.com/2010/03/newsweek-takes-on-sexism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

