Posts Tagged ‘ scott brown ’

Senator Brown’s Locker Room Response to Elizabeth Warren

October 6, 2011
By
Senator Brown

Senator Brown

Senator Scott Brown resorted to a locker room-style response this morning on a local Boston radio station when speaking about Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren.

Earlier in the week, during a Democratic primary debate, Warren was asked how she paid her tuition. Alluding to Senator Scott Brown’s Cosmopolitan photo shoot she said, “I kept my clothes on.”

This morning, the radio show host asked Brown, “Have you officially responded to Elizabeth Warren’s comment about how she didn’t take her clothes off?” To which the Senator responded, “Thank God,” then he and the host laughed like teenagers.

We weren’t thrilled when we heard Warren’s comment during the debate. We’d prefer she stay on the high road. However, while Warren referenced Brown’s actions, the  Senator referenced his challenger’s appearance. His comment was low.

Was it sexist? Perhaps the “Blink-and-you-might-miss-it“ variety. Taken alone, what Brown said could be viewed as just immature and not very savvy. But couple it with previous campaign behavior – with his silence on the campaign trail in 2010 when a supporter suggested shoving a curling iron in then opponent Martha Coakley - and it stinks.

Read The Hello Ladies Guide to Sexism in Politics here.

 

 

Photo from Medill DC used with a Creative Commons License


Elizabeth Warren Is Running for Senate

September 14, 2011
By
Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren has officially entered the Massachusetts Senate race. She enters a crowded Democratic primary field which includes Newton Mayor Setti Warren and City Year founder Alan Khazei, to challenge Republican Senator Scott Brown who won the special election last year to fill the late Senator Kennedy’s seat.

In an email to supporters, Warren said, “Washington gives some of the biggest corporations in the world special loopholes and tax breaks, while middle-class families and small businesses struggle. This is wrong. Our hard-working families deserve someone who believes in them, someone who is going to stand up and fight for their interests. That’s why I’m running for the United States Senate.”

Warren,  a Harvard law professor, made headlines earlier this year when she was tapped by President Obama to start the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency she championed following the financial meltdown on Wall Street. She came under intense scrutiny and fire from Republicans and Obama ultimately appointed Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to head the organization.

Warren is smart and tough and many Democratic party insiders think she is the candidate best suited to raise the money needed to run against Brown. Visit her campaign site to learn more.

Footnote: I am writing this blog post while I sit with my young daughter. I tell her Elizabeth Warren is running against Senator Scott Brown and remind her Massachusetts has never sent a woman to the Senate. “I want to be a Senator someday so I can make rules,” she says. I am so proud. “Like everyday is chocolate day,”  she finishes. Yet another reason we need more women in office. I love her.

 

 

 

Scott Brown Skips “It Gets Better” Video

July 28, 2011
By

All but one member of the Massachusetts Congressional Delegation taped a video for the It Gets Better Project. Senator Scott Brown declined an invitation to particpate.

The It Gets Better Project was created to show lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth that life gets better after the teen years. The project has amassed more than 10,000 videos from celebrities, activists and politicians.

Regarding the Senator’s decision to pass on the taping, Brown’s spokesperson said, “Scott Brown has a strong record at the state and federal level against bullying and believes that all people regardless of sexual orientation should be treated with dignity and respect. His main focus right now is on creating jobs and getting our economy back on track.”

However The Boston Globe pointed out, “Last week, despite his jobs focus, the senator also announced legislation – and gave an interview – to combat marine mammal abuse after the shooting of six seals on Cape Cod.

At least our sea life won’t be bullied.

2010 Political Review (Slideshow)

December 31, 2010
By

Here is a look back at just a few of the political stories we were talking about in 2010. What do you think 2011 will bring?

News from Around the Web

October 13, 2010
By

Krystal Ball

It’s good to be back. Here’s what we missed while we were away.

The Paycheck Fairness Act is expected to be taken up by the Senate after the November election break and now there’s new data on the wage gap and weight.  A new study from the University of Florida suggests the wage gap is smaller for thin women and larger for larger women. According to the study, women who weigh 25 pounds over “average” weight, earn approximately $13,847 less than an average-weight woman. The worst part of the findings: men earn an additional $8,347 when they gain 25 pounds in a year. Ladies, no matter what the scale says, please call your Senators (1-877-667-6650) and urge them to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act. Women deserve fair pay, no matter what the scale says. If men can pack on the pounds and the promotions, so can we.

Meanwhile, another important piece of legislation for women is moving ahead in the state of New York. The paid sick leave bill would require businesses to provide employees up to 72 hours of paid sick leave each year. Business with fewer than 20 workers would be required to offer employees no more than 40 hours of paid sick leave. This bill would help ease the stress of pregnant workers trying to schedule doctor’s appointments, of working parents who need time to care for sick children and for workers who need to care for elderly parents.  Mayor Bloomberg, however, is talking about vetoing the bill.

Also in New York, a court-appointed juvenile counselor who pled guilty to raping a teenage girl and sexually assaulting two others was sentenced to ten years probation and no jail time. The rape victim was in the counselor’s custody inside the court building, when the rape took place. After, he escorted her to a court appearance. The girl was sentenced to 12 months in prison for filing a false police report.

 Back to politics, California Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown was caught on tape referring to his Republican opponent Meg Whitman as a whore. Brown apologized to Whitman saying, ““That does not represent anything other than things that happen in a campaign.” Actually it does. It represents the very damaging ways women are referenced everyday. What many deem as harmless comments collectively harm the role of women in society. But until terms like whore are called out by a political opponent, they often go unchecked in every day discussions.

And finally, Krystal Ball, Democratic candidate for Congress in Virginia, is facing scrutiny after old photos of her and her ex at a holiday party were posted online. Ball, however, is holding her ground. Yes, she says the photos are embarrassing but she believes sexist and political motives are behind their surfacing. And she is urging other women not to let stupid moments caught on camera keep them from running for office. After all, a spread in Cosmo didn’t stop Scott Brown from advancing to the Senate.

Ball’s unapologetic response to her past and her candidacy in the Huffington Post is a great read. Check it out here.

Footwear and the Midterm Elections

August 28, 2010
By

Kate Spade "Halle" wedge

Sometimes, I know I like something, but I don’t know why. I could be enjoying a cabernet sauvignon, for example, and then someone with a better palate than mine says, “This is so deep and rich. So many tannins. Do you taste the chocolate?” And bingo! It all becomes clear.

And so it is with politics. For years I thought my interest stemmed from a sense of civic duty, a desire to make the world a better place, from wanting to hold my legislators accountable, demand justice, transparency and equality. But recently it’s become clear to me. I am interested in politics because I love shoes.

Shoes, you see, matter a great deal in politics. The voters in Colorado understand this. They just gave the GOP primary nod to Senate hopeful Ken Buck, the man who said he deserved the vote because he doesn’t wear high heels. He will face Senator Michael Bennet in the general election. Bennet is too frequently photographed from the waist up and so I need to learn more about his footwear. Florsheim? Cole Haan? Gucci? Time will tell.

Senator Michael Bennet

And Bennet should not take this scrutiny lightly. After all, you remember what happened in the Massachusetts Senate race, don’t you? After easily winning the primary, Attorney General Martha Coakley foolishly underestimated her “age-inappropriate Mary Jane shoes” and lost the general election to Scott Brown, who most likely learned the importance of shoes from Helen Gurley Brown.

Congressman Stephen Lynch gets it. He won’t make the same mistakes Coakley did. Not him. Lynch is paying close attention to the message Massachusetts voters sent in January. And that’s why he is touting his footwear as a reason to vote for him, not challenger Mac D’Alessandro. Fashion forecast for fall: red is the new black and work boots are the new barn jacket.

The New York Times gets it. Last week some women were upset about a story in the Times featuring Congress hopeful Reshma Saujani which dedicated half a sentence to her political goals and 13 paragraphs to her shoes. While I think the story should have appeared in the Style section and a separate, more substantive piece on Saujani is owed New York voters, I did find the article informative. Reading it I learned that the 3 inch high, $300 Kate Spade Halle wedge is the footwear of choice for women in politics. Wearing these shoes you can canvass neighborhoods, run to catch a flight and have “drinks at a new hotel lounge with tech entrepreneurs hungry to see their kind in politics.”

I am going to buy a pair. And then I am going to run for office. I may not be a shoo-in to win but I will certainly be a shoe-in.

Mac D’Alessandro: We Don’t Need More Democrats; We Need Better Democrats UPDATED

August 25, 2010
By

 

Time magazine predicts healthcare is no longer the number one issue on midterm voters’ minds. “Voters are far more concerned about the stalled economy or soaring budget deficits,” writes Time. But here in Massachusetts, the state that elected the 41st vote, healthcare is still dominating the discussion in at least one race leading up to the September 14 state primary. What little discussion taking place, that is.

Incumbent Stephen Lynch is facing a challenge in the ninth Congressional District from Mac D’Alessandro, the former New England Political Director for the Services Employees International Union. Lynch, you will recall, voted no on healthcare reform because he says the bill “stripped out all the significant reform.” D’Alessandro disagrees. “He should tell that to the people in the district whose children have pre-existing conditions,” he says. D’Alessandro says he got in the race because “The thought of (Lynch) going unchallenged gave validity to his healthcare vote.”

Winning in September won’t be easy for D’Alessandro. He entered the race late with little name recognition and far fewer funds and insider connections than Lynch. But he is running a smooth grassroots campaign and he easily wins over many of the people he meets on the campaign trail. D’Alessandro, you see, is not afraid to take a stance. I met with D’Alessandro last week, and while our discussion focused primarily on women’s rights, he had plenty to say on healthcare, Iraq, immigration reform, private industry, the environment and the economy. 

On disenfranchised women voters who feel let down by the Democratic Party, he says, “It’s not just women. Lots of progressives do. That’s why we don’t need more Democrats in office. We need better Democrats.” 

On the glass ceiling, he says, “It’s titanium coated and some of it is still so ingrained in our culture. I noticed especially with healthcare that a lot of people aren’t even aware of the insidious nature of some of the insurance industry’s practices.”

On choice, he states on his website, “A woman’s right to choose must always be protected.” And he is clearly against the Stupak amendment, something Lynch supported with an early healthcare vote in Congress last fall. 

You can read his position on the other issues on his campaign website. You cannot do that at Lynch’s site. With less than three weeks to go until the election, Lynch’s issues page merely says, “Coming soon.”

Stephen Lynch's blank Issues Page

So even if one could argue Lynch is not afraid to take a stance; that going against the Democrats on healthcare – in Kennedy country no less – was certainly a bold move, you have to wonder why he won’t defend, discuss or debate his vote.

On August 5, D’Alessandro invited Lynch to a series of debates. As of today, no debates have been scheduled. D’Alessandro’s team was told by Lynch’s campaign that the Congressman has assembled a debate negotiation team, but that team hasn’t been able to put anything on the calendar. If that isn’t a telling example of how Washington doesn’t work, than what is?

The voters in Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District deserve information, transparency and discourse. But Lynch isn’t cooperating. I have never found a candidate with whom I agree 100 percent and D’Alessandro is no exception. But assuming we align on the issues that matter most to me, I will always support the candidate who is willing to both talk, and listen, to their constituents. That is why, “I am a Mac.” 

Reminder: today is the last day to vote in the September primary.

UPDATE: Mac D’Alessandro announced on September 2 he has received the endorsements of three leading pro-choice, pro-women’s health organizations — NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC, the National Organization for Women PAC, and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

Woman in Politics: Harmony Wu

May 25, 2010
By

Harmony Wu

Since we’re always urging women to get involved politically, we thought it would be informative to share insights from a woman who is. Last week I sat down with Harmony Wu, a political activist in Needham, Massachusetts to find out what motivates her to do what she does.

I first heard of Wu when I worked on the Martha Coakley for U.S. Senate campaign. Volunteers at the phone bank I managed would come in every night and say, “You need to meet Harmony. You should really meet Harmony.”

Fast forward to the healthcare vote and our induction of Congressman Stephen Lynch into the Ignorant Male Legislator’s club. We posted a job opening for someone to take his place in the Ninth Congressional  district; someone who would represent the district and lead with courage and integrity. Later that same day, we heard Harmony Wu was considering a run for the seat.

After some serious consideration, Wu decided not to run, posting this statement on her website:

Over the last two weeks, I have met with numerous people to address the many aspects of a potential campaign against Mr. Lynch. The ability to maintain my family life during the campaign and as a member of Congress has always been an important factor for me, as it has been for so many women seeking and serving in office. In my case, it prevents me from launching what would be a vigorous campaign and if elected, committing to a life that would require far too much time away from family at this moment in our lives. In the end, this is the decisive factor for me.

I admit I was slightly disappointed that Wu cited family life not just as a factor in her decision, but as a factor for other women considering political life. I understand family first. I do. And in her shoes I may have reached the same decision. I just don’t want to see all women painted with the same broad brush stroke. I don’t buy into the idea that maintaining and preserving the family unit is a woman’s job. I believe it is a parent’s job and should be based on the individual, not the gender. Just like running for office should be an individual decision, not a gender decision.

Fast forward again. I finally met Harmony Wu and she opened up about her decision-making process.  And what she had to say about the prospects for women in politics is a fair and unsurprising commentary from someone who took a close look.

Wu wasn’t always politically active. But observing the Bush administration inspired her to get involved in the last presidential election. “I swore I would do everything in my power to do more,” she says and after the primary she volunteered for the Obama campaign with Organizing for America.

After the presidential election, Wu worked on a local Selectman’s campaign but wasn’t active on a  day-to-day-basis. “Then Ted Kenendy passed away,” she says. And things in Massachusetts changed. Wu went from the Senate race to the race to fill Scott Brown’s State Senator seat. Both candidate’s she supported  lost, but she wasn’t deterred.

In fact her energy and organizing skills attracted attention and Wu was drafted to run against Lynch. “I spent a lot of time exploring, talking to people. There was a lot of support and people telling me, ‘We’ll do what we can.’ But there were also people saying I wasn’t an insider, I had no experience and asking me if I could raise money.”

Wu says her ability to raise money was always the first question asked of her, although for her, the number one question was could she do the job. In the end, she determined that job, one that requires constant fundraising, was not for her.

I asked Wu if, based on what she saw up close, a woman could get elected in Massachusetts? “You know there’s a woman thing, but also a regular person thing,” she says. “Unless you’re on a path to be Guy Smiley from the day you’re born, it’s tough to break in. There’s a gate, a barrier. The lifestyle is different. It’s not family friendly.

“It’s the professionalizing of politics. You have to be in it — in training. It’s been made so unattractive. Massachusetts politics… it’s a tough club.”

Still, Wu believes there’s a “huge pent up desire” to see a woman elected, at least in the more progressive communities.  And she is by no means backing down. She isn’t running for Congress but she is supporting Mac D’Alessandro in his primary bid against Lynch, tearing up the Twitter on the #mapoli hashtag and organizing her neighbors at Yes We Can Needham.  Wu won’t hold an elected office any time soon, but she will hold those in office accountable. And if you’re a progressive woman looking to run, Wu’s probably got your back.

REMINDER: We are giving away a print from Carolyn Draws. Leave a comment and we’ll enter you in our contest.

A job opening and an induction

March 19, 2010
By

Wanted: A candidate for the Mass Ninth Congressional District. This individual will represent all of the people of the district and lead with courage and integrity. The candidate must value diversity and equality and must not allow their personal religious views to enter into politics. Must be able to vote for the people — not just to keep the seat. Disingenuous candidates need not apply. A strong track record of pro-woman actions and support is a plus. A small army of supporters is ready to assist you in this position. Applications will be reviewed immediately.

And now, an induction: Hello Ladies has “deemed” that Representative Stephen Lynch D-MA “passes” the test for an Ignorant Male Legislator Award and we are inducting him into the group. Rep. Lynch probably could have joined after he voted yes on the Stupak amendment, but we gave him a pass. However, after hearing his “disingenuous” reasons for why he plans to vote no on healthcare reform, we are welcoming him to the club.

Lynch told WBZ radio that the bill “stripped out all the significant reform.” We disagree. In the current system women pay significantly higher premiums and face other discriminatory practices based on pre-existing conditions that include having a c-section, being raped or having been the victim of domestic abuse. Righting those wrongs is pretty significant. The bill would also help the currently uninsured, an estimated 32 million Americans. Again, rather significant.

We agree with Lynch on one thing: this bill is far from perfect. For instance, the anti-abortion amendments in both the House and the Senate version are some of the most restrictive moves against reproductive rights in decades. And the lack of a public option is highly disappointing. But we need healthcare reform and cannot afford to “go back to the drawing board” for an indefinite number of years.

Lynch’s move smells of a calculated political play to hang onto his seat in November following a Brownswell of voters who shook up the Commonwealth in January.

One more thing: Katha Pollitt has a great piece in The Nation on pro-choicers and healthcare reform. Check it out here.

Stop the Rape Culture (TRIGGER WARNING)

January 25, 2010
By

(TRIGGER WARNING) A woman was raped last week in Toledo, Ohio on the side of busy street in broad daylight.  A high school student approached her as she was walking down the street and threatened her with a pair of scissors. Cars drove by and several beeped. One witness called 911 but no one stopped. According to the local police, some witnesses thought the act was consensual and some may not have comprehended what they were seeing. How could they have? This is not supposed to happen in a  civilized society.

Late last year, we were shocked and frightened by the gang rape of a high school girl outside a school dance in Richmond, California. Now we are sickened by a rapist brazen enough to attack out in the open in broad daylight.

(Trigger warning) Over at Shakesville, there is an excellent piece on rape culture – what it is and what contributes to it. I’ve linked to it before. Again, if you can read it, I recommend it.

I thought I was done writing about the Senate election in Massachusetts, but as I reread Melissa McEwan’s piece at Shakesville, I couldn’t help but reflect on our new Senator-elect.

During the last weekend of the campaign, someone at a rally for Scott Brown yelled out a suggestion for Brown’s opponent Attorney General Martha Coakley, “Shove a curling iron up her butt,” yelled the unseen man. You can watch the video here.  Brown asserts he did not hear the comment. But he certainly heard about it after the fact and he never expressed any outrage. That is rape culture.

A rape takes place every two minutes in this country. One in three women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. Who is going to reverse this trend? Certainly not the politician who sees no need to decry public outbursts suggesting sodomy.  Victims should not be held accountable for stopping rape. Rapists, public safety officials and our elected leaders must be held accountable.

And since I plan to stop writing about the election, I want to get this off my chest too. Senator-elect, women are not property.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes