Posts Tagged ‘ scott brown ’

Why the Hate?

January 21, 2010
By

For the last three months I volunteered my time to the Martha Coakley for Senate campaign. I held signs, made calls, (yes, that was me calling incessantly), canvassed, recruited, tweeted and blogged. Following her loss, I feel much better than I expected I would. Maybe it’s because I know I did all I could to get my candidate elected. Maybe it’s because it feels good to speak up for that which you believe. Maybe it’s because I have seen bigger political disappointments (like the Supreme Court naming George Bush president over Al Gore and then the country electing Bush to a second term). Or maybe it’s because I know, if we were still standing after those eight years, we will still be standing at the end of Senator Brown’s term.

I am not going to engage in post-election quarterbacking. So many others have that covered. But I do want to share what I witnessed on the campaign trail. These experiences were as, if not more, upsetting than the final outcome.

Leading up to the primary, when our group of local volunteers stood out in the cold, holding signs on street corners, most drivers passing by either demonstrated their support with a honk or a thumb’s up, or they ignored us. When we called to ask voters if they would support Martha Coakely, they answered yes, hung up, or responded with a quick, “I’m for Capuano, or Khazei, or Pagliuca.”

After the primary, when we made calls, we started hearing, “I would never vote for her,” or, “No way I’m voting for Coakley.” When we stood out on corners, some drivers would roll down their car windows and yell. “Go Scott Brown,” or “Coakley sucks.”

The #masen Twitter feed, which had been rather sleepy but mostly civil leading up to the primary, was suddenly flooded with #teaparty tweets, some of which contained crude, tasteless comments about Chappaquiddick and Mary Jo Kopechne.

The morning of the election, while holding a sign with two other women outside a polling location (which is also my child’s elementary school,) a man, in a truck,  slowed down, rolled down his window, and yelled to us, “Martha Coakley is a fucking beast.”

At the end of a long day, I was waiting to get results at another polling location. A man, older than me, came in to check the numbers for Scott Brown.  We introduced ourselves and he asked me if I actually liked my candidate, or was I just following party lines. I happen to be an Independent. He was talking to me when I excused myself to read a text from my husband. “Sweetheart,” he said. “You should be at home with him.” Then he proceeded to tell me I was a Socialist and I wouldn’t be happy until I turned the country into Sweden. Sweden, according to this man, is a country of “lard asses” who are lazy and don’t produce anything. Usually I try not to use one data point to describe an entire country. But I asked this man if he had ever been to Sweden. He had not. I have. In fact, I went to tour a manufacturing facility, and was impressed by the innovation I saw there.

Just as I was wondering what Sweden had to do with the Massachusetts special election, he brought the conversation back to Coakley.

“She is stupid,” he said.

“Actually, I think she is quite smart,” I responded.

“Stupid, stupid, stupid.”

“I disagree.”

“She doesn’t even know who Curt Schilling is.”
“I don’t care if my Senator can name the 2002 starting lineup for the Red Sox,” I said.

“She is STUPID.”

At that point the polling warden came over to share the results with us. I took out my notebook and pen and wrote them down. My Brown counterpart looked around for something to write on and then said, “You are going to write them down for me too, aren’t you?”

“No.”

“You’re not?” He seemed surprised.

“No.”

You really won’t help me?” He seemed shocked.

“No. I came prepared with a  paper and pen. You did not. Who’s stupid now?”

It was that exchange, and the man swearing at me from his truck, that had me more depressed than the final results. So much rudeness. So much hate. And that, is what prevailed in this election.

Pay Attention to Mass Senate Race

January 13, 2010
By

Ladies, it’s time to pay attention to the special election in Massachusetts to fill Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat, no matter where you live. When voters go to the polls next week, January 19, women everywhere stand to either gain or lose a lot.

Democratic nominee and Attorney General  Martha Coakley is running against Republican nominee and State Senator Scott Brown.  There is a third candidate in the race, Independent Joe Kennedy (no relation to the late Senator), but he is not considered a contender.

Until recently no one really thought Brown was a contender either. How could the Commonwealth let “The Kennedy Seat” go to a Republican? Plus, Massachusetts has not elected a Republican senator since 1972.* As a result, the race has been rather dull and garnered very little attention outside the Commonwealth.

And then the Senate passed its version of the healthcare bill and suddenly, things got interesting. Conservative interest groups, fueled by a desire to elect Brown as the 41st vote against the bill, started pouring money and volunteers into the race. The American Future Fund, a group whose members are believed to be behind the Swift Boat ad and the Willie Horton ad that hurt John Kerry and Michael Dukakis’ presidential campaigns, launched a $400,000 attack ad against Coakley. Twitter users started flooding the social media site with pro-Brown tweets, many that reference the Tea Party. Brown even raised $1 million dollars in just 24 hours. And now, polls show the race is very close.

Brown’s million dollars came from across the country because right-wing conservatives want to help support and protect their interests. Women, concerned with protecting their rights, should get involved now too.

Here’s what at stake:

Healthcare: The healthcare bill, while certainly imperfect, removes gender-biased practices and stops insurance companies from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions like rape and domestic violence. In Massachusetts, Brown filed legislation designed to ease regulations on insurance companies. Under his bill, companies may not be required to cover certain medical services including mammograms and cancer screenings.

Reproductive Rights: Coakley has a long history of supporting a woman’s right to choose and control her own body. She has the support of NARAL and Emily’s List. Pro-choice advocates are disappointed that Coakley supports the Senate healthcare bill which includes restriction on abortion. But her opponent’s record on reproductive rights is more disconcerting. He is backed by Massachusetts Citizens for Life.  He co-sponsored the Women’s Right to Know Act, which would require a woman to wait 24 hours before having an abortion and view an ultrasound of their fetus. While Brown does say he supports Roe v. Wade, his campaign website reads, “I believe government has the responsibility to regulate in this area…”

Support for rape victims: Brown sponsored legislation that would allow healthcare workers to turn away rape victims from emergency rooms if they objected to providing those victims with emergency contraception.

Equal representation: Women represent 51 percent of the population but only 17 percent of the legislation. Until a group reaches critical mass, at least 30 percent representation in leadership, they are viewed and evaluated as “special interest” rather than representative. Every competent, qualified women we elect, brings us one step closer to critical mass. And, as we’ve written before,

“Women legislators bring much needed attention to so-called women’s issues such as childcare, elder care, fair workplace policies and healthcare. They serve as role models for young girls and increase women’s overall participation in government and civic issues. And women politicians work hard. According to a study from the University of Chicago and Stanford University, women in Congress, on average, introduce more bills and secure more money for their districts than their male counterparts do.”

No candidate is ever perfect ladies. But if we are going to work together to support our interests, we must remove the phrase, “I want to vote for a woman, but…” from our vocabulary and take action.

Here is what you can do:

Donate: Link here to make a donation.

Volunteer: Make calls to voters and help get the message out.

Vote: If you live in Massachusetts, get out and vote on Tuesday, January 19.

Support other qualified women candidates.

*Massachusetts has never sent a woman to the Senate.

Nation Focuses on Mass Senate Race

January 11, 2010
By

In the last week, the once sleepy Massachusetts Senate Race has heated up. Republican Scott Brown’s campaign has been bolstered by tighter than expected polls and support from out-of-state conservative groups. The election is viewed as a barometer for what’s to come later this year and just how much support President Obama does or does not have for healthcare reform and other policies.

For an overview of what’s happening on the ground, read this update on Care2.com. Tomorrow, we will discuss what’s at stake for women in this race.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes