By now you’ve probably heard that Washington Post fashion columnist Robin Givhan took on Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan and her wardrobe in Givhan’s column this past weekend. She wrote about Kagan, “mostly she embraced dowdy as a mark of brainpower.” Why is it the media always assumes women who don’t relish fashion are making some kind of statement? Last month Kate Betts at The Daily Beast tackled Hillary Clinton’s wardrobe and “distinctly dowdy pumps.” Betts wrote about Clinton’s Oscar de la Renta suits, “She wears them to fit in, not to stand out, and that’s what bugs me.” How does Betts know that? And how does Givhan know Kagan dresses to send a message about her brains? They don’t. Yes fashion can make a statement – a powerful one at that – but only for the people who care about that stuff. Remember that episode of “Sex and the City” when Berger says to Miranda about a guy who never called after the first date, “he’s just not that into you“? Well guess what Givhan and Betts, some people just aren’t that into fashion. Some people, believe it or not, wear clothes because they have to – clothes keep them [...]













