Posts Tagged ‘ so sexy so soon ’

Tinseltown Turns to Teens

December 20, 2010
By

Glee Cast

A new report from the Parents Television Council (PTC), Tinseltown’s New Target: A study of Teen Female Sexualization on Primetime TV, shows a disturbingly high amount of sexualized image of teen girls on primetime television. The study follows PTC’s report from last November about the increase in incidences of violence against women on television.

Teenage girls are becoming Hollywood’s sexualized ideal. Consider these findings from the study:

“The presence of an underage female was associated with higher amounts of sexual depictions compared to the onscreen appearance of an adult female. Though an older female character is more likely to have sexual dialogue in the scene, a younger female character is more likely portrayed in sexual behaviors onscreen.”

and

Only 5% of the underage female characters communicated any form of dislike for being sexualized.”

The study defines sexualized as “the act or process of sexualizing,” meaning making the girl or act sexual in nature. The American Psychological Association (APA) regards a person as being sexualized if:

  • their value comes only from their sexual appeal or sexual behavior
  • they are sexually objectified
  • or sexuality is inappropriately imposed upon them.

PTC  identified the top 25 primetime shows for kids age 12-17, and viewed only those that were scripted. The study is based on The Office, NCIS, Two and a Half Men, The Big Bang Theory, The Vampire Diaries, Grey’s Anatomy, Desperate Housewives, Lost, Family Guy, House, Glee, The Cleveland Show, American Dad, and The Simpsons.

The organization found that “underage female characters are shown participating in a higher percentage of sexual depictions compared to adults (47% and 29% respectively)” and that

93 percent of the sexual incidents among underage female characters were classified as unhealthy according to the APA definition. Furthermore the data shows that 73 percent of the underage sexualized incidents were presented as humor.

But there’s nothing funny about it. Television is powerful and it amplifies what we are experiencing in so many other mediums: advertising, magazines, books (Twilight, anyone?). We can tell our daughters to turn off the boob-tube, but they’ll still get the message that society expects them to be young, pretty and “hot. “You can read the full report online. It contains a section, copied from an APA report, called “What Parents Can Do.” The suggestions include:

-          Watch TV and movie s and read magazines and websites with your children so you can discuss the images they encounter.

-          Educate your children about healthy and unhealthy relationships. Don’t expect them to know, especially when their favorite characters are engaged in unhealthy relationships (Twilight anyone?)

-          Tell your child why you don’t like a show, a character or a song’s lyrics.

-          Speak up to the retailers, publishers, producers and advertisers who push hyper-sexual images on young girls.

You can also visit So Sexy So Soon for more tips on dealing with the media’s portrayal of girls. It’s not easy. My kids know exactly how I feel about the reshaped and sculpted Scooby Gang, but my daughter would still rather be a Daphne than a Thelma. She’s nowhere near old enough to watch primetime television, but she gets her full share of pretty, dumbed-down girl characters on Nickelodeon and The Disney Channel.

And don’t forget about your sons. How do we raise them to respect women if they are spoon-fed a media diet of pretty, submissive young things? If any of you have success stories, cautionary tales or helpful hints, we’d love to hear them.

Primark Pulls Padded Bikini for Girls

April 15, 2010
By

Primark pulled this item from its stores.

There is a trouble brewing in the UK over a major retailer, Primark, selling padded bikini tops for girls ages seven and up. Under pressure from politicians (it’s election time) and parenting site Mumsnet, the store has pulled the tops. Primark has agreed to give a children’s charity profits from the sales of the tops before they were yanked.

I am opposed to products that are too sexy for young girls and I believe inappropriate media messages and marketing campaigns can be damaging to a young girl’s psyche, but something about the situation in the UK bothers me.

Perhaps it’s the fact that someone, either associated with the product or with Primark, was quoted off-the-record explaining the padding was added so that the shape of a girl’s nipple didn’t show through the fabric of the top. Now that might just be damage control but it might also be a reasonable explanation. I can understand a preteen – and her mother- wanting some extra coverage at the beach.

More likely, it’s the hints of victim blaming in some of the news stories. Several people are quoted referring to the top as the “paedo bikini.” Let’s be clear. Girls and their clothes are not to blame for pedophilia. Pedophiles are to blame for pedophilia. And then there are the protesters who are questioning why girls should ever wear two-piece bathing suits or clothes made from shiny pink fabric with gold stars. The answer to the over-sexualization of young girls is not to dress girls in Polly Flinders dresses until their wedding day. It is to hold a reasonable dialogue about what is appropriate and what isn’t. And it is not to let society dictate appopriate behavior for girls. That should be the responsibility of the family.

A single item of clothing is not the problem. If I saw a young girl at the beach in a shiny pink two piece bathing suit, high heels, makeup and hoop earrings, that would disturb me. (That’s also the reason I would never attend a beauty pageant.) But if I saw a young girl at the beach in that same suit and the rest of her clothing and her behavior were age appropriate, I wouldn’t think twice about her outfit.

Yes, we must be vigilant about inappropriate marketing to young girls. And yes, I support asserting pressure on the people who make and sell inappropriate items. But in doing so, let’s not impose upon our girls a narrow definition of what they should and shouldn’t wear. Girls are not the issue. And their clothing choices are not responsible for what’s wrong in this world.

Now, this, is a problem.

So Sexy So Soon

December 18, 2009
By

selenaWhen “Phineas and Ferb” (rated TV-G) ended last night, The Disney Channel played a video of Selena Gomez, a Disney star from one of its shows, “The Wizards of Waverly Place.” She was singing “Naturally” from the “Kiss and Tell” album.

 Gomez is 17 years old and she is beautiful. Two thoughts popped into my head while watching her, “I wish I could get my hair to look like that,” and, “Where did she get that awesome necklace?”

My next thought was, “Oh crap, my five year old daughter is watching this.” She was staring at the screen, dancing along to Selena’s moves. Off went the television.

Gomez wasn’t dressed provocatively and her moves and lyrics weren’t overt. But she was singing, “You have a way of moving me,” on Disney. And if this forty-something was coveting the pop star’s clothes, hair and accessories, then there’s a damn good chance my 5 year old was soaking it all up too.

Disney’s airing the video after a show deemed appropriate for 5 year olds, reminded me how hyper-vigilant parents must be about the media and marketing messages our children are exposed too. So it was timely that later in the night, I received an email alerting me to a new blog So Sexy So Soon, from Diane Levin, author of the book, “So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids.”  There isn’t a lot of content on the blog yet, but it’s coming. I found the tip sheet to be especially helpful and I recommend parents of young girls and boys bookmark this site.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes